Abstract:
The influence of Protagoras on Plato, particularly, concerning the latter's the
Republic is underemphasized. Perhaps, the reason for this reduction of accolade to Protagoras
owes to his classification as a Sophist. Yet, democracy is the outcome of the endeavour of
Sophists. A foremost Sophist, Protagoras marshaled out two vital points to place the quest for a
democratic tradition ahead of the desire for Athenian hegemonic aristocracy. His points being
that: first, when it comes to 'technical skills,' the gods granted upper hand to aristocrats,
therefore, no one should contest their 'technical wisdom' or expertise. Second, however, when it
regards 'political virtues' -- dikê (i.e., justice, a sense of right, what is fair) and aidôs (i.e.,
restraint, modesty, a sense of respect for others) -- the gods distributed them equally among
humans to enable humanity to live harmoniously in society, thus, everyone's view counts in
matter of politics. Strongly opposed to this Protagoras' democratic traditionalism, Plato
responded that justice, which is the hardcore of the state, requires that each individual be
assigned a primary station of life where they perform functions most suited to their nature and
training. He, therefore, advised that political leadership be entrusted to a small class of naturally
endowed and politically educated elite, whose responsibility it is to steer the ship of the state.
The context of this intergenerational dialogue is in the long drawn 'physis-nomôs ' or 'naturenurture' debate that characterized ancient Athenian politics and which subtle influence remains
unabated to the present day. This article attempts to unveil the impacts and implications of the
clash of ideas of these great Archaic scholars on the nature of modern politics. It finds that
although Protagoras' democratic traditionalism makes the broader appeal to the wider
populations of modern states, Plato's aristocratic elitism reigns supreme in the determination of
political outcomes, especially, where and when the political elites conscientiously apply
Heraclitus' hegemonic principle of 'the single continuing element.'