This comparative study examines the role of local governments in three African federal states: Ethiopia, Egypt, South Africa, and Israel. While all operate within federal systems, the degree of autonomy afforded to local governments varies significantly. Through the analysis of primary and secondary public and official documents and review of related literature, the paper finds that the South African multi-tiered yet interdependent federal system, together with its emphasis on legislative, executive, and fiscal powers for municipalities, appears more conducive to local autonomy than Ethiopia and Egypt. The Ethiopian federal system, despite its emphasis on ethnic federalism, provides limited constitutional recognition and self-rule for local governments. While the Egyptian Constitution is a realist Constitution that recognizes and allocates executive and regulatory powers to local governments, their autonomy is constrained by significant state influence. Nevertheless, it is still more conducive than the Ethiopian case, where the autonomy of the local government is subservient to the discretion of the state. In conclusion, the South African model, while not without its challenges, may offer valuable insights for other countries seeking to enhance the role and effectiveness of local governance from the perspective of bottom-up federal governance, which is so vital to the deepening of the federal constitutional diversity down to the society. This connotes an area for further studies pointing to the accommodating imperatives of constitutionally empowering local governments in the Ethiopian federal constitutional dispensation, which still struggles with the quest for bringing regional ethnic minorities on board.