Evaluating Diagnostic Methods for Transfusion-Transmitted Malaria: RDT vs. Microscopy in Blood Donation Screening
Sr No:
Page No:
35-44
Language:
English
Authors:
Aquel Rene Lopez*, Abigail Lamptey, Michael Mark Addae & Akwesi Afriyie Achiampong
Received:
2025-11-19
Accepted:
2025-12-26
Published Date:
2026-01-05
Abstract:
Background: Transfusion-transmitted malaria (TTM) remains a significant public health
concern in malaria-endemic regions such as Ghana. The persistence of Plasmodium falciparum
in donated blood, often undetected, poses a risk to transfusion recipients. This study evaluates
the diagnostic accuracy of Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDTs) and microscopy in detecting P.
falciparum in donor blood.
Aim: To compare the diagnostic performance of RDTs and microscopy in detecting P.
falciparum in stored blood samples at SDA Hospital, Accra.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 115 blood samples donated to SDA
Hospital. The samples were screened using First Response RDT kits and Giemsa-stained
microscopy (gold standard). Sensitivity, specificity, and parasite density were analyzed using
SPSS version 26.
Results: Of the 115 samples, microscopy detected P. falciparum in 8.7% of the cases, while
RDTs detected 6.1%. Microscopy showed 100% sensitivity and specificity, while RDTs
demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 99.1% specificity. Blood group O positive was most
frequently associated with parasitemia. All infected donors were male, with parasite densities
ranging from 600 to 1200 parasites/µL.
Conclusion: Both RDTs and microscopy showed high diagnostic performance, but microscopy
detected more positive cases. Given the residual risk of TTM, integrating both diagnostic
methods in screening protocols is recommended to improve transfusion safety in malariaendemic regions.
Keywords:
Plasmodium falciparum, Malaria Diagnosis, Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDTs), Microscopy, Blood Donor Screening.